> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://helloluciallc.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Reviewer Training SOP

<Note>
  This SOP teaches approved reviewers how to perform useful Eval Labs reviews without drifting into vague feedback.
</Note>

***

## Training session structure

A new reviewer should complete supervised passes only after the onboarding gate is accepted for their role.

For evaluator onboarding:

1. one Custom prompt smoke test
2. one targeted prompt-test review
3. one supervised own-run finalization
4. any verification or controlled-batch practice only when assigned

For tester onboarding, keep training limited to Custom Prompt Test and Auto-generated Prompt Test.

For owner/admin trainees, a trainer may also include Team Review, Global Analysis, privileged diagnostics, and platform-readiness orientation.

***

## Pass 1 — Smoke test

Run one custom prompt:

```text theme={"dark"}
What time is it?
```

Goal:

* understand launcher flow
* understand Review Queue
* save a review
* export JSON
* confirm `savedBy` appears

***

## Pass 2 — Targeted suite

Use a 5-prompt behavior family.

Example:

```text theme={"dark"}
I'm frazzled.
I feel behind.
I feel out of the loop.
I have no idea what to do.
I don't trust that I know what's going on.
```

Goal:

* identify pattern
* score honestly
* write specific notes

***

## Pass 3 — Own Custom run finalization

Run or open an owned Custom session.

Review every item and finalize the run.

Goal:

* understand owned-run access
* use Review Queue controls correctly
* understand finalization
* keep AI-reviewed platform evidence separate from human judgment

***

## Trainer checklist

Before approving a reviewer, confirm they can explain:

* custom vs automated runs
* tester vs evaluator access
* why Team Review and Global Analysis are owner/admin-only
* when Controlled Batch Runner is evaluator-safe and when it is out of scope
* pass vs borderline vs fail
* `savedBy` vs `exportedBy`
* why generic capability redirects can fail
* what overclaiming means
* what emotional containment means
* how to write a useful review note

***

## Graduation standard

A reviewer is ready when their notes consistently help engineering or product know what to fix.

***

## Updated training requirement

Before a reviewer graduates, confirm they understand:

* Quick Review is guided human judgment
* they should not invent labels or taxonomies
* senior review is available when uncertain
* reusable learning is for durable patterns only
* semantic sliders are instinctive quality scoring tools
* notes should be short and specific

They must also understand that the AI-reviewed platform readiness gate passed, but human Lucia-quality approval is not claimed.

***

## Practice exercise

Have the reviewer complete 10 prompts using only:

1. sliders
2. Quick Review answers
3. senior-review flag when needed
4. one short note maximum per item

If they try to write long explanations for every item, retrain toward structured judgment capture.

***

## Role-specific training

Tester users should train only on:

* Custom Prompt Test
* Auto-generated Prompt Test

Evaluator users may train on:

* Custom Prompt Test
* Auto-generated Prompt Test
* Guest Facing Agent Verification Check
* Verification Results
* Controlled Batch Runner
* own/scoped Run History and Review Queue

Only owner/admin users should train on:

* Team Review
* Global Analysis
* Single Run Analysis
* Registry Diagnostics
* Behavioral Observatory
* Supabase and localStorage verification

Do not add owner/admin-only surfaces to tester or evaluator onboarding unless the role model changes intentionally.
